Instantaneous bather load reduction for low turnover rate

Home Forums Support Instantaneous bather load reduction for low turnover rate

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #38095
    Neil Ballard
    Participant

    I am reading the pwtag code of practice I am trying to calculate instantaneous bather load as our circulation rate is low but the formula is not laid out clearly. The calculation is either:

    pool volume
    ________________________
    (turnover period x 1.7)

    or

    Pool volume
    _________________ x 1.7
    turnover period

    can you tell me which is correct?

    Many thanks,
    Neil Ballard

    • This topic was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by Neil Ballard.
    #38104
    Stockwell Safety
    Keymaster

    Hi Neil,

    The instantaneous bather load calculation is:

    Water depth Maximum bathing load
    < 1.0m 1 bather per 2.2m2 1.0 m to 1.5m 1 bather per 2.7m2 > 1.5m 1 bather per 4.0m2

    The circulation rate calculation is:

    Maximum bathing load x 1.7

    Does that help?

    #38105
    Neil Ballard
    Participant

    Thanks for your reply but no it doesn’t answer my question. I need to calculate the reduced Instantaneous Bather load as per the PWTAG Code of practice page 18 because our circulation rate is lower than recommended. On that page they print the calculation but it is not very clearly laid out and it is hard to tell whether you multiply or divide by the factor of 1.7. That is my question.

    #38112
    Stockwell Safety
    Keymaster

    I see. It’s the top calculation in your initial post. Multiply whatever your turnover is by 1.7. Whatever that number is is what you divide the water volume by.

    #38116
    Neil Ballard
    Participant

    Great, thanks for that.
    I did the calculation another way (reducing the Max Bather Load by the same percentage as my actual flow rate was slower than that calculated by the (Maximum Bathing load x 1.7)formula above) and came to that conclusion as the two results were similar but I’m happy you’ve confirmed it for me.
    They really ought to extend that division bar over the x 1.7 in their text to make it clear!

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.