Unit NG1: Management of health and safety
Unit NGC 2: Risk Assessment
Appendices

The force of law – punishment and compensation

An overview of health & safety law

Watch the video to learn more about:

  • 0:05 Common law duties
  • 0:25 The H&S at Work Act
  • 0:45 ‘Reasonably Practicable’
  • 1:24 The ‘Management Regs.’
  • 1:36 Risk assessment
  • 2:21 Other secondary legislation

Having watched the video above, can you answer this question?

Sources of Law

judgement scale and gavel in judge office

The law is made in two different ways, i.e. there are two sources of law – common law or statute.

Statute law takes priority over common law and may be enacted to address a perceived inequity in the common law.

Common law often aids the interpretation of statute law as terms are debated in the courts based on the facts of a real case.

Common law

Historically this meant law that was not local but was common to all of England. More usually, the phrase means a law that is not the result of legislation. Instead, court decisions establish common law through precedents (also known as ‘case law’).

Under common law, employers have a legal duty to provide…

  • safe and suitable plant and equipment
  • safe systems of work, with adequate supervision and instruction
  • safe premises, including safe access and egress
  • safe and competent employees

Statute law

Or legislation, is law made by Parliament as an ‘Act of Parliament’, or a statutory instrument (e.g. Regulations) made under powers within an Act of Parliament.

The framework of criminal health and safety legislation in the UK is illustrated in the diagram.

Click on the info icons for brief summaries.

Levels of legal duty

In statute law, there are different levels of legal duty;

  • Absolute duties
  • Practical duties
  • Reasonably practicable duties

To explore this, see if you can figure out the level of legal duty from the summary information provided.

Don’t worry; you’ll get to see the correct answers before moving on.

Types of law

The law is divided into two branches (or types) – civil and criminal, which have different purposes. An incident may give rise to both civil and criminal consequences.

There are some critical differences between criminal law and civil law.

See if you can figure them out.

Click the blue arrows in the top-right to go full-screen.

Criminal law liabilities

Role, functions and powers of H&S regulators

The HSE regulate health & safety in higher hazards sites in England and Local Authorities regulate the lower hazard sectors.

Watch the video to learn more about:

  • 0:05 Who enforces H&S
  • 0:34 Powers of H&S inspectors
  • 1:32 Enforcement options
  • 1:50 Simple cautions
  • 2:10 Improvement notices
  • 2:46 Prohibition notices
  • 3:24 Prosecution

Prosecution

brown wooden gavel on brown wooden table

Any breach of legislation may give rise to a prosecution in the criminal courts.

summary offence is typically defined as an offence with a maximum sentence of 6 months imprisonment or a 5,000 pound fine for anyone offence. Thus, this is the least serious type of criminal offence and is dealt with in a magistrates court.

An indictable offence is typically defined as one that carries the maximum sentence for said offence (up to 2 years for H&S offences). Thus, indictable offences are the most serious offence and are dealt with in a crown court.

The sanctions available to a crown court are greater than in a magistrate’s court.

Summary of maximum penalties

Company directors convicted of health and safety offences and being prosecuted can also be disqualified from being company directors.

Fees for intervention (FFI)

silver and gold coins on white printer paper

If an employer is in material breach of health and safety law, they will have to pay for the time it takes for the HSE to identify the breach and help put things right. This includes investigating and taking enforcement action.

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007

low angle view of office building against sky

Suppose a person is killed at work because of how the company’s activities are managed or organised by its senior management. In that case, the organisation could be found guilty of corporate manslaughter or homicide. However, to be found guilty, there would have to have been a gross breach of a relevant duty of care.

The sanctions available to the courts include unlimited fines, publicity orders and remedial orders.

The Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate manslaughter suggests that an appropriate fine level will seldom be less than £500,000 and may be measured in millions of pounds!

Case Study: Corporate Manslaughter

Scrap metal recycling firm fined £2 million after admitting the corporate manslaughter of an employee ‘in an incident waiting to happen’. 

Possible defences of criminal charges

crop asian judge working on laptop in office

The primary defence to criminal charges under health and safety legislation is that the particular duty has not been breached. This is a matter of fact for absolute duties but arguable for those duties qualified by terms such as ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’, ‘reasonable’ or ‘practicable.’

Note: the onus of proving that the duty has been fulfilled rests with the accused, not the prosecution.

In some cases, it may be possible for the accused to argue that he is not the duty holder (e.g. an employer or a person who has control of premises).

Civil law liabilities

Negligence

When an employee is injured at work and seeks to make a personal injury claim, the employee may sue under the tort of negligence. A tort is a ‘civil wrong’ and is to civil law as a crime is to criminal law.

Negligence may be explained as careless conduct injuring another. For the injured party (claimant) to succeed in a negligence claim, he must prove:

  1. That the defendant (usually the employer) owed him a duty of care;
  2. That this duty was breached; and
  3. That the claimant was injured as a result of the breach.

It might help to think about the concept of proving negligence as a three-legged stool. To succeed with a claim, the claimant needs to keep all three legs intact (the stool remains stable).

To defend against a claim, the defendant needs to knock away one or more of the legs (the stool topples).

Click on the i symbols for summary information.

Defences against claims of negligence

In the first instance defences against negligence rely on disproving any of the three steps outlined above, i.e.

  • The defendant did not owe the claimant a duty of care
  • The duty of care was not breached (the defendant had taken reasonable care / the loss was not foreseeable / it was an ‘act of God’)
  • The breach of the duty of care did not give rise to the injury

In addition, the following may also be used as a defence:

  • The injury was the sole fault of the employee
  • The injury was the sole fault of a third party
  • The proceedings were not brought within the specified time limit (see notes on the Limitations Act below).

Contributory negligence

Contributory negligence arises when the claimant’s own carelessness, or disregard for personal safety, contributes to the injury or loss which arises partly because of the claimants own fault and partly because of the fault of another (the defendant).

Damages recoverable in respect of the claim will be reduced to the extent the court thinks fair, having regard to the claimant’s share of responsibility for the damage.

Vicarious liability

Vicarious liability is a legal liability imposed on one person making them liable for civil wrongs committed by another.

With regard to a personal injury claim for an accident in the workplace if an employee, acting in the course of normal employment injures another employee, the employer (not the employee who injured another) will be held vicariously liable.

Have a read of these case summaries and see if you can determine the outcomes.

Tort of breach of statutory duty (TBSD) – New & Expectant Mothers

pregnant woman holding her baby bump

As an alternative to suing for negligence, new or expectant mothers can sue for damages caused by breaches of regulations 16 or 17 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

This may provide a more straightforward course of action as these statutory duties are more specific than the general duty of care.